The super rich are rattled by the Panama Papers, but what does that mean for the rest?
It has been 10 days since the first set of stories from the data dump of Mossack Fonseca and the ensuing #Panama Papers started. Today the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has called an emergency meeting to take stock of the Panama leaks, tax havens and the much-needed reforms in the global tax regime. For the uninitiated, OECD is the group of 34 richest countries who are the primary authors of the global taxation regulations. India has observer status in the group.
Will the Panama Leaks and OECD call fix the tax cheating and illicit financial flows problems forever?
First, a few facts. Tax havens and leaks like this one may seem to concern only the super-rich, but in reality, they affect all our basic services as well as our future and shared destinies. Consider this:
Alas, instead of getting a seat at the table to co-write the global taxation regulations, the outcome of FfD was a UN and OECD engineered Tax-Inspectors-without-Borders, according to which OECD experts would go to different countries to build capacities of tax officials so they can catch tax evaders and cheaters. We have done a detailed Global Summits podcast on FfD, in which the fiasco was also discussed at length.
So is the Panama Scandal the perfect storm?
The alacrity with which OECD has called the meeting — before the meeting scheduled in May by the United Kingdom — shows some alarm. The rules have to be drafted with the participation of the developing countries too. The poor and developing countries are not just victims of tax avoidance when rich multinationals dodge taxes in their political boundaries, but also when their own super-rich citizens use the same secretive channels to dodge taxes.
It will be an irony-just-died moment if the UK was the first to host the meeting on tax evasion considering its second-term Prime Minister David Cameron has been linked to ownership in an offshore company owned by his father, in Bahamas. However, considering so many British territories and crown dependencies from British Virgin Islands, Caymen Islands, Jersey are also tax havens, the UK does have a responsibility.
Perhaps after the failed FfD of 2015, the Panama exposure of 2016 and the shrinking global social sector and aid budgets are the perfect arguments to fix the system. But that needs as, Duncan Green summarises:
“Voices of the Global South: We need to establish the idea that tax havens are a development issue…we need to have some real people saying the same thing. Some developing country finance ministers……Those voices also need to be at the table on any negotiations, to ensure developing country interests are represented in any big overhaul of the system.”
We also need to find new sources of finance, like the Robin Hood Tax (i.e. taxing financial transactions), and implement public registries with beneficial ownerships, cross-border tax intelligence.
The Indian problem
Considering some of our super-rich and vocal nationalists are also exposed in the Panama leaks, it’s asking for too much if we hope that the OECD conference or the following UK conference will fix the Indian malaise.
Like much else, the Indian tax avoidance is also home-grown partially and legitimised fully. From 2005-06 to 2015-16, the total revenue forgone in the annual budget on luxury items used by the elite has expanded to more than 140%. Gold, diamonds and jewelry write-offs are Rs 61,126 crore. That’s 58% more than the highest allocation for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA), the programme for the poor and the indigent. And nearly 70% higher than the sum for “agriculture and farmers’ welfare”, as this Outlook article succinctly summarises. Since 2005-06, the amount written off as duties on gold, diamonds and jewellery comes to over Rs 4.6 trillion, which is more than 13 times this year’s allocation for agriculture and farmers’ welfare.
Hence it will take much more than OECD conference to fix our tax avoidance challenge.
A word on the coverage
But Wikileaks’ chief editor Julian Assange has a different take. On Al Jazeera’s Listening Post, he stated, considering no one has direct access to the 11.5 million documents except for ICIJ scribes, the world is hearing the story interlocuted via the ICIJ. Al Jazeera’s episode is aptly titled “Has the media censored the story?”
Left-leaning magazines like Counterpunch have questioned the ICIJ’s credentials, considering it is funded by George Soros Foundation, MacArthur Foundation et al, and Guardian chose to break story on Putin’s cellist first, before exposing the David Cameron link.
We haven’t heard the last, either on tax avoidance or on the narrative around Panama Leaks. Precisely the reason why we should track the story from multiple angles and to see if India does take any concrete steps after all this.
Oh, and in case you were wondering why American names didn’t feature in this exposé, that’s because in some states in the United States of America offer complete secrecy and bargain basement taxes, which makes parts of the country a tax haven. How’s that for a local benefit?